04 December 2009
There can be only ones and zeros
Is that a manual-focus lens? Why are you using that? You should get an auto-focus lens. Manual-focus lenses on modern cameras offend me. I find them very offensive. You should get modern lenses.
Some people are still shooting film. Can you believe it? I can't believe it. Have you gone digi-tal? I heard they aren't going to make film anymore.
You should definitely go dig-ital. Everything is going to be dig-ital soon. I have a digi-tal camera. It has 12 megapixels. I have really good pictures of my cat. Take a look at them. I printed all of them from my dig-i-tal camera. I used the dig-ital printer at the store to make these digi-tal prints from my dig-ital camera. I'm going to get a digi-tal printer of my own so I can make my own dig-ital prints at home. Then I won't have to pay for digital prints of all of my pictures. I will only print the ones I like.
These pitchers of my cat are my favorites. He's so funny! I like digital pitchers because I can look at them on the screen and if they didn't work, I can delete them and try again.
Should I get a digital flash for my digital camera? I want to make sure the digital light is compatible with the digital camera. And I definitely want to make sure the digital glass in my digital lens is compatible with my digital camera. See, this lens is a digital lens. It's on the label: "Digital."
You know pretty soon there won't be any thinks. They're going digital. Have you gone digital?
26 November 2009
Cheyenne River Bridge near Hot Springs, November 26, 2009
![]() |
| Bridge detail over the Cheyenne River in Fall River County, South Dakota, November 2009. (Photo by Daniel Binkard) |
Labels:
Black Hills,
bridge,
close up,
cloud,
fore-mid-back,
Hot Springs,
road,
South Dakota,
stream
Location:
Fall River County, SD, USA
04 November 2009
It helps me in the bathroom, too
Wow, these are great pictures! What kind of camera do you have? I'll bet it was really expensive. You probably have one of those professional cameras. Those can take really nice pictures.
Is that the one that has the advanced auto focus? You know, those can track a jet at 1000 mph. You don't even need a tripod. That one can go to 102,000 speed. I'll bet you use that speed all the time. Everything can be in focus there!
I want to get a good camera, so I can take pictures like that. I'm saving up for it. Right now I have a Sony Mavica that I got on sale. I like that it's easy to use. You just put the disk in the computer and get your pictures. They aren't as nice as your pictures, but when I have enough money saved I'll get one of those really good cameras.
Maybe I'll get the one with 24 megapixels. That way I can crop it really close.
24 October 2009
Flower, October 24, 2009
![]() |
| Flower closeup near Ponca, Nebraska, October 2009. (Photo by Daniel Binkard) |
Location:
Ponca, NE 68770, USA
23 October 2009
Tree Outline, October 23, 2009
![]() |
| A tree on Binkard Hill, lit by electronic flash from multiple sides, October 2009. (Photo by Daniel Binkard) |
Location:
Ponca, NE 68770, USA
06 October 2009
Is this lens soft?
I was reading about this lens and a bunch of people said it was soft. Is it soft? I don't want a soft lens. I think I wasn't looking for the softness when I bought the lens, but now I want to know. I mostly print wallets and 4x6's from the kiosk at the store. You know, you put your digital memory card in and get prints in 10 minutes? I looked at my 4x6's with a magnifying glass to see if I could find the softness, but I'm not sure. I also looked at the photos at 100% and 200% on the screen, but I'm not sure. I just want to make sure this lens is sharp, because soft lenses aren't what good photographers want. Maybe I should sell this lens and wait for them to make a second version with improved anti-softness.
14 July 2009
Font management
One of the reasons I like using Macs is their built-in font management. Linux has been less useful since the Gnome font viewing software disappeared, and Windows is just painful. I did use AMP Font Viewer for a while, and it worked pretty well, but not as simply and smoothly as Font Viewer on the Mac.
Oh, and NeoOffice works with OTF fonts. OpenOffice.org on Linux always seemed second-rate without that support. Where is it, guys?
Oh, and NeoOffice works with OTF fonts. OpenOffice.org on Linux always seemed second-rate without that support. Where is it, guys?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




